PHONESTORM AT THE U.S. SENATE: THE GRASSROOTS INUNDATE U.S. SENATE
PHONE LINES
There is a phonestorm at the U.S. Senate over Ohio. This afternoon,
while a group of activists met with Senators urging a challenge and
filibuster of the Ohio Electoral Ballots, staff at the Democratic
Senate Offices volunteered information the phones were inundated
with calls. This was the case in office after office after office.
While the group of several activists met in Senate offices, the
phones were ringing "off the hook" with callers raising concerns
about Ohio. It was incredible! You may have never seen anything like
it!!!
YOUR CALLS ARE HAVING AN EFFECT!!! YOUR CALLS ARE SWAMPING THE PHONE
LINES OF THE U.S. SENATE!!! KEEP IT UP!!! WE CAN STILL TURN THIS
AROUND!!! CALL EVEN MORE OFTEN (I.E., TWO OR THREE TIMES A DAY)!!!
SENATORS ARE BEGINNING TO HEAR THE CONCERNS FROM THE GRASSROOTS!!!
CALL REPUBLICAN MODERATES LINCOLN CHAFFEE, SUSAN COLLINS, AND
OLYMPIA SNOWE!!!
TELL THE SENATORS TO CHALLENGE THE OHIO ELECTORS!!! TELL THE
SENATORS TO FILIBUSTER THE OHIO ELECTORS!!! VISIT THE SENATORS
PERSONALLY OVER THE NEXT THREE DAYS!!! WEAR ORANGE!!! TELL THE
SENATORS TO CHALLENGE, THEN FILIBUSTER, THE OHIO ELECTORS!!!
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL, Rumored to be Senator Likely to Challenge
Electoral Ballots from Ohio (30 minutes after Activists Visit
Office)!!!
According to democrats.com Bob Ferik bLog entry, Florida Sen. Bill
Nelson is ready to challenge electoral ballots. The bLog was posted
approximately ½ hour after activists visited Nelson's office in the
Hart Senate Office Building where Nelson's staff were telling
callers Nelson would not challenge Electoral ballots. However, the
citizen activists arrived and presented a flier regarding
challenging - and filibustering - Ohio Electoral ballots and
additional information regarding how the plaintiffs in the Ohio
litigation actually have Kerry/Edwards leading the vote in the
State. bLog entry follows:
Stolen Election 2004: Monday Update
by Bob Fertik (http://blog.democrats.com/user/6) on January 2, 2005,
8:48 p.m. Revised January 3, 2005, 10:03 p.m.
Breaking: Will Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)
(http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001094.htm) challenge Ohio's
Electors? (http://blog.democrats.com/node/2287)
A source in Bill Nelson's office has informed The BRAD BLOG that
Nelson is seriously taking a look at the issue, and is currently
amidst meetings and phone calls on the very topic...
The staffer was willing to tell us off the record, in regard to
whether Nelson will join the challenge, that "I am hoping that he
will. And so is he...There are many of us in the office who are
hoping he will do so."
Pressed about the "so is he" comment, the staffer explained that
Nelson has been a long time campaigner for "higher voter
accountability" and is troubled by many of the reports he's seen
concerning the results of Election 2004.
The staffer told The BRAD BLOG that Nelson has been in communication
with Sen. John Kerry, and is currently "waiting to hear back" from
him. He could not, however, tell us what the results of those
communication have been so far.
Sen. Robert Byrd's Office Indicates that Rumor is Spreading Byrd
Will Challenge Ohio Electoral Ballots!!!
According to staff at Sen. Robert Byrd's (D-WV) office, there is a
rumor Byrd will challenge Ohio Electoral Ballots!!! The staff would
not confirm or deny Byrd's position.
Coalition Against Election Fraud (CAEF) Interested in Filibuster
Strategy
Sheila Parks of the Coalition Against Election Fraud (CAEF)
contacted activist on Sunday, January 2, 2005, with questions and
interest regarding the filibuster strategy against Ohio Electoral
Ballots.
This strategy would have Senate Democratic leadership challenge,
then filibuster, the Ohio Electoral ballots. The authority for
Senate to do this is under own rule (Rule XXII) on debate. Since the
U.S. Senate would adjourn from the joint meeting with the U.S. House
of Representatives - in the event of a challenge; the U.S. Senate,
therefore, meets as the U.S. Senate itself. Thus, its Rule XXII
governs. Rule XXII applies as opposed to 3 U.S.C. 17; the Federal
statute states debate is limited to two hours. Rule XXII provides
for unlimited debate unless 60 Senators vote to end debate.
The U.S. Senate rules are granted by the U.S. Constitution: Article
I, Section 5, Clause 2. The U.S. Constitution trumps a Federal
statute. In short, 60 votes trumps two hours. Rule XXII applies to
any "...other matter pending before the U.S. Senate...." This
strategy would allow 45 Democratic Senators - if they stand firm -
to block Bush's election on January 6, 2005. Foreseeably, the
filibuster could be in effect for weeks - as long as it takes to
resolve the fiasco fairly in Ohio. This would prevent Bush from
being inaugurated on January 20, 2005. According to the plaintiffs
in the case, the amount of votes in dispute exceeds Bush's so-
called "margin of victory". In addition, the plaintiffs indicate
Kerry is actually leading in Ohio in a true, un-manipulated, un-
suppressed, un-fraudulent vote count.
Note: foreseeably, the only way to stop Bush is with the filibuster
strategy. If the U.S. Senate - and House of Representatives - both
vote on the Ohio Electors, the Republicans control both houses, and
by majority vote would approve the Ohio Electors - and Bush - as
President. The filibuster strategy would allow the U.S. Senate to
block the vote from occurring through unlimited debate - a
filibuster - until the fair resolution of the legal dispute noted
above.
CAEF is reviewing the strategy with its own legal team, and is
considering undertaking this strategy in lobbying efforts with the
U.S. Senate.
Sen. Reid, D-NV, and Sen. Corzine, D-NJ, Staff Reviewing Rule XXII
in Comparison with 3 U.S.C. 17 in Possible Consideration of
Filibuster Strategy
The Senate offices of Senators Reid and Corzine are aware of the
conflict between Rule XXII and 3 U.S.C. 17 when visited by activist
citizen today, January 3, 2005. The comparison of the statute and
the rule is part of the filibuster strategy outlined above.
Apparently, some U.S. Senate offices staff are looking at this
comparison; this could possibly indicate an initial review of the
filibuster strategy by Democratic Senators!!!
REV. JESSE JACKSON LEADING MARCH FROM SAVAGE, MARYLAND, TO
WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 4, 2005
In what is being referred to as a Civil Rights March, Jesse Jackson
is leading a march from Savage, Maryland, to Washington, D.C., from
January 4, 2005, through January 6, 2005.
JOIN THIS MARCH!!! IT STARTS AT 10:00 A.M., January 4, 2005, AT
MARYLAND ROUTE 32 AND U.S. HIGHWAY 1, close to Baltimore/Washington
International Airport. JOIN THE MARCH IN PROGRESS BY DRIVING SOUTH
ON U.S. HIGHWAY 1 UNTIL YOU APPROACH THE MARCHERS AND JOIN IN!!!
SHOW SOLIDARITY!!!
For further details about the issues set forth herein, please
contact Chris Bush or Robin Pickering
at (410) 747-5571.